Varun was found guilty of breaching Article 2.5 of IPL code of conduct which relates to using language, actions or gestures which disparage or which could provoke an aggressive reaction from a another player in the Match.
"Varun Chakaravarthy admitted to the Level 1 offence under Article 2.5 and accepted the Match Referee’s sanction. For Level 1 breaches of the Code of Conduct, the Match Referee’s decision is final and binding," the IPL statement read.
According to IPL code of conduct Article 2.5 includes "any language, action or gesture used by a Player and directed towards a batter upon his/her dismissal which has the potential to provoke an aggressive reaction from the dismissed batter, whether or not any reaction results, or which could be considered to disparage or demean the dismissed batter, regardless of whether the batter him/herself feels disparaged or demeaned (in other words, a ‘send-off’).
"Without limitation, Article 2.5 includes: (a) excessive celebration directed at and in close proximity to the dismissed batter; (b) verbally abusing the dismissed batter; and (c) pointing or gesturing towards the pavilion."
In the match, CSK registered a gripping two-wicket victory over KKR at the Eden Gardens. Batting first, KKR posted 179 for 6, which looked enough on a tacky surface, but CSK dug deep to pick up two points in a season already lost to them, while KKR saw their top-four ambitions take a dent.
"Without limitation, Article 2.5 includes: (a) excessive celebration directed at and in close proximity to the dismissed batter; (b) verbally abusing the dismissed batter; and (c) pointing or gesturing towards the pavilion."
Also Read: LIVE Cricket Score
Article Source: IANS
You may also like
Tommy Fury makes awkward Jake Paul U-turn moments after triumphant comeback
Which became 'Sudarshan Chakra' for India
China 'strongly' urges India, Pakistan to exercise calm, restraint
'Indian first': Hina Khan schools trolls from Pakistan amid Operation Sindoor
HFI chief on India-Pakistan handball clash: 'Nation comes first, but we need clear guidelines'