NEW DELHI: Centre on Tuesday contended before Supreme Court that its recent ruling in Tamil Nadu governor’s case, which fixed a time period for President and governors to take decisions on bills, does not address all aspects of the legal battle between Kerala govt and its governor.
Kerala govt counsel K K Venugopal told a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi that the issue raised by it stood addressed by SC’s recent verdict. “Matter covered by the recent judgment. The issue is what is the time limit for reference to the President. That is held to be three months… based on a Govt of India circular,” Venugopal said.
Kerala government had approached SC against the governor for sitting on bills passed by the state assembly in 2024.
Attorney general R Venkataramani and solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, however, told the bench that certain aspects were not covered by SC’s judgment and would need to be examined. “Judgment does not cover certain issues of this case on facts. We would like to show those differences,” the AG said.
Kerala govt counsel K K Venugopal told a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi that the issue raised by it stood addressed by SC’s recent verdict. “Matter covered by the recent judgment. The issue is what is the time limit for reference to the President. That is held to be three months… based on a Govt of India circular,” Venugopal said.
Kerala government had approached SC against the governor for sitting on bills passed by the state assembly in 2024.
Attorney general R Venkataramani and solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, however, told the bench that certain aspects were not covered by SC’s judgment and would need to be examined. “Judgment does not cover certain issues of this case on facts. We would like to show those differences,” the AG said.
You may also like
Couples therapy? Michelle Obama addresses marriage trouble rumors, says 'he is my ...'
Brits are bored of food that tastes like 'cardboard' - and are eating more of these flavours instead
Tottenham and Man Utd Champions League qualification controversy explained in UEFA rules verdict
Ruben Amorim issues Man Utd players firm demand as financial woes put into perspective
Brits warned to leave DIY to the professionals this Bank Holiday weekend
